> > > > > So I've just returned from a long summer holiday to the Adelaide Law
> > > > > School. However, it's absolute hell (please note all of these
> > > > > "opinions" listed are just that - other people may have their own
> > > > > views). Nevertheless, it's absolute hell for me. Construction work is
> > > > > everywhere; it's impossible to basically get into the Law School. So
> > > > > obviously I try to get to the bottom of this catastrophe.
> > > > > I do a quick Google Search for "Adelaide Law School" and I find a
> > > > > myriad of articles relating to Rosemary Owens, the new Dean of Law who
> > > > > has replaced Paul Fairrel, the more popular Dean of Law, may I add.
> > > > > This includes everything from getting rid of Rosemary Owens (http://
> > > > > groups.google.com.au/group/alt.lawyers/msg/5a38332095acfe5a ); to a
> > > > > petition asking to drop Rosemary Owens (http://www.petitiononline.com/
> > > > > adelaw/petition.html).
> > > > > Initially, I was going to leave names out of this, but seeing as
> > > > > though Rosemary Owens has now scored herself a Wikipedia page (http://
> > > > > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemary_Owens), albeit small, the only
> > > > > information found on the website is her selfpromotion, and her
> > > > > interest in "feminist research theory". Talk about a biased Law
> > > > > School.
> > > > > Anyway, this controversial Law Dean, popular to some, in a string of
> > > > > best-selling Law books; but hated by others, in a string of YouTube
> > > > > videos that attempt to make fun of her inability to lead the Law
> > > > > School (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7voZWvy0vxk).
> > > > > There have also been news articles asking her to step down (http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200812/1229927043.html).
> > > > > Her last least popular step was an absolute "overhaul" of the Law
> > > > > degree, causing existing students to entirely restructure their
> > > > > degree; in what some students have claimed to be a "pain in the ass".
> > > > > Making an absolute mockery of the Law School on the Internet, only
> > > > > time will tell where she will bring the Law School. All we know for
> > > > > now is she is hated, at least by the majority of those who use the
> > > > > Internet.
> > > > Not one such listing in Yahoo. Google specializes on popularity hits,
> > > > which is usually the profanity stuff, Yahoo specializes on content,
> > > > where all hits tend to be official stuff. People tend to click on
> > > > profane
> > > > stuff if they see it and Google brings it up first.
> > > > Try Yahoo, I long long time ago switched to Yahoo.
> > > > Your life will change 20 percent.
> > > Google problems will keep you busy online for 20 years, then you get
> > > old and realize they are stalkers, but then the whole sex life is
> > > gone.
> > > Google is a real fascist.
> > Google is first order violation of free speech and conduct by
> > organized fascism.
> > They have crimes against humanity reports at the UN.
> When I complained on the phone to the FBI about Google taking
> millions of books without copyright for profit, the FBI man
> said such complaints constitute war against the United States.
> He would have never said that if I were to make a complaint about
> Radical supremacy at fascist levels.
Google considers that all information online is for taking, that there
is no private possession online, be it a person, a soul.
Only dictators have that kind of mentality. Google said to the
world with their Streetview product that Google believes it is the
same to see a street through cameras or in person. Anne's Clar Der
Kommissar. Ask Ceausescu what he would have thought of that
statement as Ceausescu considered using cameras in the streets,
Ceausescu would have said: "All things are the property of Romania".
Google not only considers that all information online is for taking,
they openly profile masses which is racism, and no surprize they
started adding racist features. They openly collect profiles on usenet
populated by other tools not just Google, and set up a feature to
even encourage reporting a person based on his/her profile.
Intelligent people know one cannot openly racist and report
a black man based on his profile, as this is not racist South Africa.
Apparently you are complaining about matters of real civil rights
regarding Google and why this and that when they engage in